John Bokma wrote:

> http://johnbokma.com/mexit/2004/04/2...condlimit.html

That can be worked around[1], but Karl never specified the length of time
he needed to record for anyway.

____
1. A new recording is limited to 60 seconds, but it is possible to record
*over* an existing longer recording. So make a 60 second blank
recording and use Sound Recorder's "Decrease Speed" feature to double
its length to 120 seconds, then 240 seconds, 480 seconds, etc --
however much you need. Then record over that.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact

Toby Inkster <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:

> John Bokma wrote:
>
>> http://johnbokma.com/mexit/2004/04/2...condlimit.html
>
> That can be worked around[1], but Karl never specified the length of
time
> he needed to record for anyway.
>
> ____
> 1. A new recording is limited to 60 seconds, but it is possible to
record
> *over* an existing longer recording. So make a 60 second blank
> recording and use Sound Recorder's "Decrease Speed" feature to double
> its length to 120 seconds, then 240 seconds, 480 seconds, etc --
> however much you need. Then record over that.

Less cumbersome:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/82215

But both methods are kludges.

--
John Need help with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:

--> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html

I've used Total Recorder from http://www.HighCriteria.com for several
years and I love it.

Rik <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote in message:
e7db5$45b64b8f$8259c69c$EMAIL REMOVED,

> nullified wrote:
>> On 23 Jan 2007 17:18:08 GMT, John Bokma <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
>>> Toby Inkster <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
>>>> Karl Groves wrote:
>>>>> Does anyone know of a utility that will record the audio being
>>>>> played by the computer?
>>>> Does Windows still come with "Sound Recorder"?
>>> http://johnbokma.com/mexit/2004/04/2...condlimit.html
>> spammer
>
> Pffffff, someone does not get it...

Nah, he's just grinding his favorite ax. :-)

However, the group's FAQ is quite clear on this point; it is acceptable
to post one's url if it appropriately addresses a question or issue that
has been raised.

Though it would be better if he also summarized the point of the article
that the url references.

--
Red