In <op.tlfzl4j1m9g4qz-EMAIL REMOVED>, on 12/31/2006
at 09:07 PM, "William T***o" <EMAIL REMOVED> said:

>ooooh lookee - I gone and caught meself a handbag waving queen of
>scream.

Is that what su madre la puta told you?

*PLONK*

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
<http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to EMAIL REMOVED

In <Xns98AADDE2DB235mecharlessweeneycom@130.133.1.4 >, on 12/31/2006
at 09:48 PM, Charles Sweeney <EMAIL REMOVED> said:

>Google for "shoot the messenger".

I'm not sure what a messenger is in your universe, but in the real
world the word doesn't refer to someone who drops a third parties
trash over his fence. The admin of a malconfigured MTA is not a
messenger, he is a disease vector.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
<http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to EMAIL REMOVED

In <Xns98AC1CC81849Bmecharlessweeneycom@130.133.1.4 >, on 01/02/2007
at 02:49 AM, Charles Sweeney <EMAIL REMOVED> said:

>Feel free to offer more mitigation for spammers.

Feel free to continue lying.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
<http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to EMAIL REMOVED

In <Xns98ADB31271D96mecharlessweeneycom@130.133.1.4 >, on 01/03/2007
at 05:36 PM, Charles Sweeney <EMAIL REMOVED> said:

>I imagine you could get blinkers and ear plugs too. Then you will
>never see or hear anyone you disagree with. You would also look
>like an arse.

Well, she may look like an arse but you are an arse. Forget the pint:

*PLONK*

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
<http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to EMAIL REMOVED

In <Xns98AC20DFBC4ACmecharlessweeneycom@130.133.1.4 >, on 01/02/2007
at 03:13 AM, Charles Sweeney <EMAIL REMOVED> said:

>All I see is mitigation for the spammer here.

Then you need medical attention for your hallucinations.

>I'm surprised that you ask the question.

Thus demonstrating your witlessness.

>I would have thought

ObQuirk.

>it could not be any clearer that I hold the spammer solely
>responsible for his spam

In effect giving the spammer a free ride. When the police arrest the
driver of a getaway car, do you believe that they are exonerating the
bank robbers? Before you say it, yes, I am aware that the anology is
not original; it is, none the less, valid.

>so I shouldn't have thought there was any
>doubt over my position.

Yes, your position is that we (TINW) should do nothing about those
that facilitate spam. That's the reason for suspecting that you are
working for the spammers.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
<http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to EMAIL REMOVED

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote

> *PLONK*

clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap

And for his next pronouncement...

--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote

> In <Xns98ADB31271D96mecharlessweeneycom@130.133.1.4 >, on 01/03/2007
> at 05:36 PM, Charles Sweeney <EMAIL REMOVED> said:
>
>>I imagine you could get blinkers and ear plugs too. Then you will
>>never see or hear anyone you disagree with. You would also look
>>like an arse.
>
> Well, she may look like an arse but you are an arse. Forget the pint:
>
> *PLONK*

Another one defeated. Anyone else game?

--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote

> Yes, your position is that we (TINW) should do nothing about those
> that facilitate spam. That's the reason for suspecting that you are
> working for the spammers.

LOL!!! Pissed as well as dense!

It's quite simple Smell, I say spammers are solely responsible for their
spam, you say they are not.

--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com

In article <45981608$10$fuzhry+tra$EMAIL REMOVED> ,
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
>In <en1a06$44q$EMAIL REMOVED>, on 12/28/2006
> at 08:38 PM, EMAIL REMOVED (Seth Breidbart) said:
>
>>If MTA2 is sending a message to MTA1 at the time, it knows it's not a
>>dictionary attack.
>
>Not in general, especially not in a large network. The SMTP client and
>the SMTP server in MTA2 are likely to be separate processes.

It's not my fault your left hand doesn't know what your right hand is
doing.

(OK, I should have said "knows or should know".)

Seth