Hi
I' heard that only page with a rank like 4+ will be a vote for my site.
If a webpage mainsite has a ranke = 6 and a subpage with a rank =1 and
the subpage link to my site, will it help me or not?

Thanks for Help



Harald


http://www.shrfamily.com/

On 13 Dec 2006 04:16:17 -0800, "laffen" <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:

>Hi
>I' heard that only page with a rank like 4+ will be a vote for my site.
>If a webpage mainsite has a ranke = 6 and a subpage with a rank =1 and
>the subpage link to my site, will it help me or not?
>
>Thanks for Help

Do you want help, or an answer to your question?

Your site will benefit from clear content, well laid out without
spurious markup and gizzmos (eg: web counters).

Page rank is a spurious red herring which can tempt the gullible and
naive into buying links, a path which surely must lead to search
engine blacklisting.

Don't take my word on it, visit Google and check their guidance for
webmasters.

Matt

EMAIL REMOVED (Matt Probert) wrote in news:457ff49f.20162531
@news.madasafish.com:

> On 13 Dec 2006 04:16:17 -0800, "laffen" <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
>
>>Hi
>>I' heard that only page with a rank like 4+ will be a vote for my site.
>>If a webpage mainsite has a ranke = 6 and a subpage with a rank =1 and
>>the subpage link to my site, will it help me or not?
>>
>>Thanks for Help
>
> Do you want help, or an answer to your question?
>
> Your site will benefit from clear content, well laid out without
> spurious markup and gizzmos (eg: web counters).
>
> Page rank is a spurious red herring which can tempt the gullible and
> naive into buying links, a path which surely must lead to search
> engine blacklisting.
>
> Don't take my word on it, visit Google and check their guidance for
> webmasters.
>
> Matt
>
>
>

Beyond what matt just wrote (which is dead on, IMO) you should take note of
the semantics of the term "page rank". Particularly, note that it doesn't
say "site rank". IOW, Your "benefit" is directly proportional to the PR of
the *page* that links to you. If someone has PR6 on their home page and
your link appears on a sub-page with a PR1 then that's it, you have a PR1
link.

Think about it - if all that mattered was the home page's PR, then why
would ALL the pages have their own PR?

--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com

And lo, laffen didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:

> Hi
> I' heard that only page with a rank like 4+ will be a vote for my site..
> If a webpage mainsite has a ranke = 6 and a subpage with a rank =1and
> the subpage link to my site, will it help me or not?

If SEO requires you do any abstract calculation more complicated than 1
+ 1, then you are doing it wrong.

Grey

--
The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the
pitfall corollary that nothing is ridiculous.
- http://www.greywyvern.com/orca#search - Orca Search: Full-featured
spider and site-search engine

"laffen" <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:

> Hi
> I' heard that only page with a rank like 4+ will be a vote for my site.

Not true. Might be that the person who said that got confused because some
time ago Google only showed backlinks with PR4 or higher. It's important
to know that what Google shows might not be the actual case.

> If a webpage mainsite has a ranke = 6 and a subpage with a rank =1 and
> the subpage link to my site, will it help me or not?

Yes. It's important to note that what you see (PageRank) is a snapshot
that Google made of its private PageRank collection, and exported to the
public PageRank collection. So the 1 you see now might be in reality a 4,
which will become visible with the next update.

See: <http://www.seocompany.ca/pagerank/page-rank-update-list.html>

Oh, and you will notice that there are quite some people who say that PR
is worthless and there are people who say that it's the motherlode. The
truth is somewhere in between (the former often have a low PR, or feel
left out for some other reason, the latter either have a high one, or are
selling something to improve it).

IMO, PR has less value then 3-4 years back, but it's /still/ used by
Google, and probably will be for some time.

And getting backlinks is still good.

And with a site with 14k visitors (see sig) I guess I can say that I have
a bit of understanding what I am talking about :-)

--
John Need help with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:

--> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html

John Bokma <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote in
news:Xns98987ABC3D42Ecastleamber@130.133.1.4:


>
> And with a site with 14k visitors (see sig) I guess I can say that I
> have a bit of understanding what I am talking about :-)
>

You've only had 14k visitors to your site?



--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com

Karl Groves <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:

> John Bokma <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote in
> news:Xns98987ABC3D42Ecastleamber@130.133.1.4:
>
>
>> And with a site with 14k visitors (see sig) I guess I can say that I
>> have a bit of understanding what I am talking about :-)
>>
>
> You've only had 14k visitors to your site?

Yeah, well the good news is, it's getting closer and closer to 15k :-D

--
John Need help with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:

--> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html

Karl Groves wrote:
> John Bokma <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote in
> news:Xns98987ABC3D42Ecastleamber@130.133.1.4:
>
>
> >
> > And with a site with 14k visitors (see sig) I guess I can say that I
> > have a bit of understanding what I am talking about :-)
> >
>
> You've only had 14k visitors to your site?


shit yea.
you go there?
fukked up yellow link farm.

itza wonder he got a 4

"Gwin" <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:

>
> Karl Groves wrote:
>> John Bokma <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote in
>> news:Xns98987ABC3D42Ecastleamber@130.133.1.4:
>>
>> > And with a site with 14k visitors (see sig) I guess I can say that I
>> > have a bit of understanding what I am talking about :-)
>> >
>>
>> You've only had 14k visitors to your site?

Should have added: /day (roughly).

>
> shit yea.
> you go there?
> fukked up yellow link farm.

I guess you either visited the wrong site, or drunk to much of that stuff
people use normally to clean their bathroom.

> itza wonder he got a 4

Last time I checked http://johnbokma.com/ it was a (solid) 7 and
http://castleamber.com/ a 6. Has been like that for years ;-) [1] Like I
said, I know a bit what I am doing.

[1] and before that both had a PageRank of 7.

--
John Need help with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:

--> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html

Thanks for all answer I think I'v a better understanding of it now.

laffen

http://www.shrfamily.com/


John Bokma wrote:
> "Gwin" <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
>
> >
> > Karl Groves wrote:
> >> John Bokma <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote in
> >> news:Xns98987ABC3D42Ecastleamber@130.133.1.4:
> >>
> >> > And with a site with 14k visitors (see sig) I guess I can say that I
> >> > have a bit of understanding what I am talking about :-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> You've only had 14k visitors to your site?
>
> Should have added: /day (roughly).
>
> >
> > shit yea.
> > you go there?
> > fukked up yellow link farm.
>
> I guess you either visited the wrong site, or drunk to much of that stuff
> people use normally to clean their bathroom.
>
> > itza wonder he got a 4
>
> Last time I checked http://johnbokma.com/ it was a (solid) 7 and
> http://castleamber.com/ a 6. Has been like that for years ;-) [1] Like I
> said, I know a bit what I am doing.
>
> [1] and before that both had a PageRank of 7.
>
> --
> John Need help with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:
>
> --> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html